Review




Structured Review

Molecular Dynamics Inc diffusion coefficients calculations
Diffusion Coefficients Calculations, supplied by Molecular Dynamics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/diffusion coefficients calculations/product/Molecular Dynamics Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
diffusion coefficients calculations - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars

Images



Similar Products

90
MathWorks Inc software for calculating the moisture diffusion coefficient
Software For Calculating The Moisture Diffusion Coefficient, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/software for calculating the moisture diffusion coefficient/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
software for calculating the moisture diffusion coefficient - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc msd analysis and calculation of the short-term diffusion coefficient d
Diffusivity distributions determined starting from exact tracks. Tracks simulated using <t>different</t> <t>diffusion</t> coefficients D S (as reported at the top of each graph) and time steps Δt (as reported in the legends) were analysed to extract the reported diffusivity (D) distributions as calculated from the first two points of the <t>MSD</t> function. Simulations were performed on a square area of 256 μm 2 with reflective boundaries at a density of 0.3 particles/μm 2 . The different temporal resolutions were obtained by appropriate sampling on the same simulated tracks, stopping at 500 time steps in each case. 385 tracks from 5 different simulations were analysed for each case
Msd Analysis And Calculation Of The Short Term Diffusion Coefficient D, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/msd analysis and calculation of the short-term diffusion coefficient d/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
msd analysis and calculation of the short-term diffusion coefficient d - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
Bruker Corporation apparent diffusion coefficient adc
Diffusivity distributions determined starting from exact tracks. Tracks simulated using <t>different</t> <t>diffusion</t> coefficients D S (as reported at the top of each graph) and time steps Δt (as reported in the legends) were analysed to extract the reported diffusivity (D) distributions as calculated from the first two points of the <t>MSD</t> function. Simulations were performed on a square area of 256 μm 2 with reflective boundaries at a density of 0.3 particles/μm 2 . The different temporal resolutions were obtained by appropriate sampling on the same simulated tracks, stopping at 500 time steps in each case. 385 tracks from 5 different simulations were analysed for each case
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Adc, supplied by Bruker Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/apparent diffusion coefficient adc/product/Bruker Corporation
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
apparent diffusion coefficient adc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Molecular Dynamics Inc diffusion coefficients calculations
Diffusivity distributions determined starting from exact tracks. Tracks simulated using <t>different</t> <t>diffusion</t> coefficients D S (as reported at the top of each graph) and time steps Δt (as reported in the legends) were analysed to extract the reported diffusivity (D) distributions as calculated from the first two points of the <t>MSD</t> function. Simulations were performed on a square area of 256 μm 2 with reflective boundaries at a density of 0.3 particles/μm 2 . The different temporal resolutions were obtained by appropriate sampling on the same simulated tracks, stopping at 500 time steps in each case. 385 tracks from 5 different simulations were analysed for each case
Diffusion Coefficients Calculations, supplied by Molecular Dynamics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/diffusion coefficients calculations/product/Molecular Dynamics Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
diffusion coefficients calculations - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Biacore diffusion coefficient calculator
Diffusivity distributions determined starting from exact tracks. Tracks simulated using <t>different</t> <t>diffusion</t> coefficients D S (as reported at the top of each graph) and time steps Δt (as reported in the legends) were analysed to extract the reported diffusivity (D) distributions as calculated from the first two points of the <t>MSD</t> function. Simulations were performed on a square area of 256 μm 2 with reflective boundaries at a density of 0.3 particles/μm 2 . The different temporal resolutions were obtained by appropriate sampling on the same simulated tracks, stopping at 500 time steps in each case. 385 tracks from 5 different simulations were analysed for each case
Diffusion Coefficient Calculator, supplied by Biacore, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/diffusion coefficient calculator/product/Biacore
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
diffusion coefficient calculator - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Molecular Dynamics Inc dynamics (md) schematics of calculation of the effective diffusion coefficient
Mass release curves at a point of a continuum determined computationally. (a) Composite medium and small (reference volume RV) around a point P. (b) Schematics of microstructure and FE model for diffusion, with boundary conditions. (c) Molecular dynamics (MD) schematics of calculation of the effective diffusion <t>coefficient.</t> (d) Mass release curves obtained using FE model of RV, normalized to the inlet/outlet surface area, in, say, [µg/µm2]. (e) Change of diffusion coefficient with the distance from solid surface for three concentrations (distance is of nanometer size; Dbulk is diffusion coefficient far from surface).
Dynamics (Md) Schematics Of Calculation Of The Effective Diffusion Coefficient, supplied by Molecular Dynamics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dynamics (md) schematics of calculation of the effective diffusion coefficient/product/Molecular Dynamics Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dynamics (md) schematics of calculation of the effective diffusion coefficient - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Wolters Kluwer Health apparent diffusion coefficient (adc) calculation
Mass release curves at a point of a continuum determined computationally. (a) Composite medium and small (reference volume RV) around a point P. (b) Schematics of microstructure and FE model for diffusion, with boundary conditions. (c) Molecular dynamics (MD) schematics of calculation of the effective diffusion <t>coefficient.</t> (d) Mass release curves obtained using FE model of RV, normalized to the inlet/outlet surface area, in, say, [µg/µm2]. (e) Change of diffusion coefficient with the distance from solid surface for three concentrations (distance is of nanometer size; Dbulk is diffusion coefficient far from surface).
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (Adc) Calculation, supplied by Wolters Kluwer Health, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/apparent diffusion coefficient (adc) calculation/product/Wolters Kluwer Health
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
apparent diffusion coefficient (adc) calculation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Molecular Dynamics Inc dynamics calculation of rotational diffusion coefficient of a carbon nanotube in fluid
Mass release curves at a point of a continuum determined computationally. (a) Composite medium and small (reference volume RV) around a point P. (b) Schematics of microstructure and FE model for diffusion, with boundary conditions. (c) Molecular dynamics (MD) schematics of calculation of the effective diffusion <t>coefficient.</t> (d) Mass release curves obtained using FE model of RV, normalized to the inlet/outlet surface area, in, say, [µg/µm2]. (e) Change of diffusion coefficient with the distance from solid surface for three concentrations (distance is of nanometer size; Dbulk is diffusion coefficient far from surface).
Dynamics Calculation Of Rotational Diffusion Coefficient Of A Carbon Nanotube In Fluid, supplied by Molecular Dynamics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dynamics calculation of rotational diffusion coefficient of a carbon nanotube in fluid/product/Molecular Dynamics Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dynamics calculation of rotational diffusion coefficient of a carbon nanotube in fluid - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Diffusivity distributions determined starting from exact tracks. Tracks simulated using different diffusion coefficients D S (as reported at the top of each graph) and time steps Δt (as reported in the legends) were analysed to extract the reported diffusivity (D) distributions as calculated from the first two points of the MSD function. Simulations were performed on a square area of 256 μm 2 with reflective boundaries at a density of 0.3 particles/μm 2 . The different temporal resolutions were obtained by appropriate sampling on the same simulated tracks, stopping at 500 time steps in each case. 385 tracks from 5 different simulations were analysed for each case

Journal: Discover Nano

Article Title: Impact of temporal resolution in single particle tracking analysis

doi: 10.1186/s11671-024-04029-1

Figure Lengend Snippet: Diffusivity distributions determined starting from exact tracks. Tracks simulated using different diffusion coefficients D S (as reported at the top of each graph) and time steps Δt (as reported in the legends) were analysed to extract the reported diffusivity (D) distributions as calculated from the first two points of the MSD function. Simulations were performed on a square area of 256 μm 2 with reflective boundaries at a density of 0.3 particles/μm 2 . The different temporal resolutions were obtained by appropriate sampling on the same simulated tracks, stopping at 500 time steps in each case. 385 tracks from 5 different simulations were analysed for each case

Article Snippet: MSD analysis and calculation of the short-term diffusion coefficient D were performed in MATLAB as previously described [ , , , ].

Techniques: Diffusion-based Assay, Sampling

Single particle tracking experiment on p75 NTR receptors fluorescently labelled on the membrane of living SK-N-BE(2) neuroblastoma cells and comparison with simulated results. A Experimental images from the movies recorded by TIRF microscopy; on each image we report the integration time; frame time was 25 ms longer due to readout time. Images are shown in the same fixed grayscale; scale bar: 5 μm. B Corresponding measured diffusivity distributions. Mean particle density was 0.3 µm −2 . Data were obtained from 2180 to 3050 tracks for each case. C Diffusivity distribution derived from detection, tracking, and MSD analysis on simulated movies with integration, frame times as written in the legend. Particle density was 0.3 µm −2 , D S was 0.75 μm 2 /s (equal to D P for all curves but the red one for which it is 0.8 μm 2 /s). 385 tracks from 5 different simulations were used for each case. In both B and C 130-frames movies were analysed for each temporal resolution. We calculated the uncertainties in the distributions for both the experimental and simulation cases; some examples are reported in Fig.

Journal: Discover Nano

Article Title: Impact of temporal resolution in single particle tracking analysis

doi: 10.1186/s11671-024-04029-1

Figure Lengend Snippet: Single particle tracking experiment on p75 NTR receptors fluorescently labelled on the membrane of living SK-N-BE(2) neuroblastoma cells and comparison with simulated results. A Experimental images from the movies recorded by TIRF microscopy; on each image we report the integration time; frame time was 25 ms longer due to readout time. Images are shown in the same fixed grayscale; scale bar: 5 μm. B Corresponding measured diffusivity distributions. Mean particle density was 0.3 µm −2 . Data were obtained from 2180 to 3050 tracks for each case. C Diffusivity distribution derived from detection, tracking, and MSD analysis on simulated movies with integration, frame times as written in the legend. Particle density was 0.3 µm −2 , D S was 0.75 μm 2 /s (equal to D P for all curves but the red one for which it is 0.8 μm 2 /s). 385 tracks from 5 different simulations were used for each case. In both B and C 130-frames movies were analysed for each temporal resolution. We calculated the uncertainties in the distributions for both the experimental and simulation cases; some examples are reported in Fig.

Article Snippet: MSD analysis and calculation of the short-term diffusion coefficient D were performed in MATLAB as previously described [ , , , ].

Techniques: Single-particle Tracking, Membrane, Comparison, Microscopy, Derivative Assay

Mass release curves at a point of a continuum determined computationally. (a) Composite medium and small (reference volume RV) around a point P. (b) Schematics of microstructure and FE model for diffusion, with boundary conditions. (c) Molecular dynamics (MD) schematics of calculation of the effective diffusion coefficient. (d) Mass release curves obtained using FE model of RV, normalized to the inlet/outlet surface area, in, say, [µg/µm2]. (e) Change of diffusion coefficient with the distance from solid surface for three concentrations (distance is of nanometer size; Dbulk is diffusion coefficient far from surface).

Journal: Computers in biology and medicine

Article Title: Mass release curves as the constitutive curves for modeling diffusive transport within biological tissue

doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.06.026

Figure Lengend Snippet: Mass release curves at a point of a continuum determined computationally. (a) Composite medium and small (reference volume RV) around a point P. (b) Schematics of microstructure and FE model for diffusion, with boundary conditions. (c) Molecular dynamics (MD) schematics of calculation of the effective diffusion coefficient. (d) Mass release curves obtained using FE model of RV, normalized to the inlet/outlet surface area, in, say, [µg/µm2]. (e) Change of diffusion coefficient with the distance from solid surface for three concentrations (distance is of nanometer size; Dbulk is diffusion coefficient far from surface).

Article Snippet: From follows that the tangent to a mass release curve (normalized with respect to the area) geometrically determines the mass flux at a considered time, J i = ( dm dt ) i = tan α (2) and then, for a given gradient ( dc / dx ) i , D i = ( dm / dt ) i ( dc / dx ) i , no sum on i (3) Note that dm has dimension mass/(unit area) and dt is time (in seconds), hence tan α is the mass flux in eq. (2) , in, say [ μg / μm 2 s ]. fig ft0 fig mode=article f1 fig/graphic|fig/alternatives/graphic mode="anchored" m1 Open in a separate window caption a7 Mass release curves at a point of a continuum determined computationally. (a) Composite medium and small (reference volume RV) around a point P. (b) Schematics of microstructure and FE model for diffusion, with boundary conditions. (c) Molecular dynamics (MD) schematics of calculation of the effective diffusion coefficient. (d) Mass release curves obtained using FE model of RV, normalized to the inlet/outlet surface area, in, say, [ μg / μm 2 ]. (e) Change of diffusion coefficient with the distance from solid surface for three concentrations (distance is of nanometer size; D bulk is diffusion coefficient far from surface).

Techniques: Diffusion-based Assay

Mass release curve for diffusion of glucose molecules through porous medium with silica spheres as solids [47]. (a) Larger porosity. (b) Small porosity of 15% and complex geometry of pores. (c) Scaling functions for glucose-silica interaction; diffusion coefficient is D(h,c)=f Dbulk, where h is distance from solid surface and f is the scaling function. (d) Mass release curves for several porosities. (e) Equivalent diffusion coefficient in terms of concentration. Model size: 125,000 3D finite elements, 132,651 nodes.

Journal: Computers in biology and medicine

Article Title: Mass release curves as the constitutive curves for modeling diffusive transport within biological tissue

doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.06.026

Figure Lengend Snippet: Mass release curve for diffusion of glucose molecules through porous medium with silica spheres as solids [47]. (a) Larger porosity. (b) Small porosity of 15% and complex geometry of pores. (c) Scaling functions for glucose-silica interaction; diffusion coefficient is D(h,c)=f Dbulk, where h is distance from solid surface and f is the scaling function. (d) Mass release curves for several porosities. (e) Equivalent diffusion coefficient in terms of concentration. Model size: 125,000 3D finite elements, 132,651 nodes.

Article Snippet: From follows that the tangent to a mass release curve (normalized with respect to the area) geometrically determines the mass flux at a considered time, J i = ( dm dt ) i = tan α (2) and then, for a given gradient ( dc / dx ) i , D i = ( dm / dt ) i ( dc / dx ) i , no sum on i (3) Note that dm has dimension mass/(unit area) and dt is time (in seconds), hence tan α is the mass flux in eq. (2) , in, say [ μg / μm 2 s ]. fig ft0 fig mode=article f1 fig/graphic|fig/alternatives/graphic mode="anchored" m1 Open in a separate window caption a7 Mass release curves at a point of a continuum determined computationally. (a) Composite medium and small (reference volume RV) around a point P. (b) Schematics of microstructure and FE model for diffusion, with boundary conditions. (c) Molecular dynamics (MD) schematics of calculation of the effective diffusion coefficient. (d) Mass release curves obtained using FE model of RV, normalized to the inlet/outlet surface area, in, say, [ μg / μm 2 ]. (e) Change of diffusion coefficient with the distance from solid surface for three concentrations (distance is of nanometer size; D bulk is diffusion coefficient far from surface).

Techniques: Diffusion-based Assay, Concentration Assay

Agarose polymer gel model-2, with flux in x direction (AA) due to prescribed concentration difference between left and right boundary of the model (according to Ref. [47]). (a) Distribution of concentration at time t=1s, microstructural model; zero-values correspond to fibers. (b) Distribution of concentration and mass flux-x along line AA, microstructural (full line) and continuum (dashed) solution. (c) Distribution of concentration and mass flux-y along line BB, microstructural (full line) and continuum (dashed) solution. (d) Mass flux-x distribution at time t= 1s. Molecule of 6.25nm, linear dependence of bulk diffusion coefficient within gel.

Journal: Computers in biology and medicine

Article Title: Mass release curves as the constitutive curves for modeling diffusive transport within biological tissue

doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.06.026

Figure Lengend Snippet: Agarose polymer gel model-2, with flux in x direction (AA) due to prescribed concentration difference between left and right boundary of the model (according to Ref. [47]). (a) Distribution of concentration at time t=1s, microstructural model; zero-values correspond to fibers. (b) Distribution of concentration and mass flux-x along line AA, microstructural (full line) and continuum (dashed) solution. (c) Distribution of concentration and mass flux-y along line BB, microstructural (full line) and continuum (dashed) solution. (d) Mass flux-x distribution at time t= 1s. Molecule of 6.25nm, linear dependence of bulk diffusion coefficient within gel.

Article Snippet: From follows that the tangent to a mass release curve (normalized with respect to the area) geometrically determines the mass flux at a considered time, J i = ( dm dt ) i = tan α (2) and then, for a given gradient ( dc / dx ) i , D i = ( dm / dt ) i ( dc / dx ) i , no sum on i (3) Note that dm has dimension mass/(unit area) and dt is time (in seconds), hence tan α is the mass flux in eq. (2) , in, say [ μg / μm 2 s ]. fig ft0 fig mode=article f1 fig/graphic|fig/alternatives/graphic mode="anchored" m1 Open in a separate window caption a7 Mass release curves at a point of a continuum determined computationally. (a) Composite medium and small (reference volume RV) around a point P. (b) Schematics of microstructure and FE model for diffusion, with boundary conditions. (c) Molecular dynamics (MD) schematics of calculation of the effective diffusion coefficient. (d) Mass release curves obtained using FE model of RV, normalized to the inlet/outlet surface area, in, say, [ μg / μm 2 ]. (e) Change of diffusion coefficient with the distance from solid surface for three concentrations (distance is of nanometer size; D bulk is diffusion coefficient far from surface).

Techniques: Polymer, Concentration Assay, Diffusion-based Assay

Agarose polymer gel model-3. (a) Mass release curves. (b) Equivalent diffusion coefficient.

Journal: Computers in biology and medicine

Article Title: Mass release curves as the constitutive curves for modeling diffusive transport within biological tissue

doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.06.026

Figure Lengend Snippet: Agarose polymer gel model-3. (a) Mass release curves. (b) Equivalent diffusion coefficient.

Article Snippet: From follows that the tangent to a mass release curve (normalized with respect to the area) geometrically determines the mass flux at a considered time, J i = ( dm dt ) i = tan α (2) and then, for a given gradient ( dc / dx ) i , D i = ( dm / dt ) i ( dc / dx ) i , no sum on i (3) Note that dm has dimension mass/(unit area) and dt is time (in seconds), hence tan α is the mass flux in eq. (2) , in, say [ μg / μm 2 s ]. fig ft0 fig mode=article f1 fig/graphic|fig/alternatives/graphic mode="anchored" m1 Open in a separate window caption a7 Mass release curves at a point of a continuum determined computationally. (a) Composite medium and small (reference volume RV) around a point P. (b) Schematics of microstructure and FE model for diffusion, with boundary conditions. (c) Molecular dynamics (MD) schematics of calculation of the effective diffusion coefficient. (d) Mass release curves obtained using FE model of RV, normalized to the inlet/outlet surface area, in, say, [ μg / μm 2 ]. (e) Change of diffusion coefficient with the distance from solid surface for three concentrations (distance is of nanometer size; D bulk is diffusion coefficient far from surface).

Techniques: Polymer, Diffusion-based Assay

Reference volume for a typical composition of tissue. The domain includes extracellular space, cell membranes and cell interior. Boundary conditions: Concentrations at inlet outlet are increased from zero to 1M with small concentration gradient, while there is no flux though lateral surfaces. (a) Concentration field in the RV and graph of concentration along a line AB. (b) Mass release curve. (c) Diffusion coefficient for the equivalent homogenous continuum. Model size: 34,000 2D finite elements, 1684 fictitious 1D element, 34,281 nodes.

Journal: Computers in biology and medicine

Article Title: Mass release curves as the constitutive curves for modeling diffusive transport within biological tissue

doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.06.026

Figure Lengend Snippet: Reference volume for a typical composition of tissue. The domain includes extracellular space, cell membranes and cell interior. Boundary conditions: Concentrations at inlet outlet are increased from zero to 1M with small concentration gradient, while there is no flux though lateral surfaces. (a) Concentration field in the RV and graph of concentration along a line AB. (b) Mass release curve. (c) Diffusion coefficient for the equivalent homogenous continuum. Model size: 34,000 2D finite elements, 1684 fictitious 1D element, 34,281 nodes.

Article Snippet: From follows that the tangent to a mass release curve (normalized with respect to the area) geometrically determines the mass flux at a considered time, J i = ( dm dt ) i = tan α (2) and then, for a given gradient ( dc / dx ) i , D i = ( dm / dt ) i ( dc / dx ) i , no sum on i (3) Note that dm has dimension mass/(unit area) and dt is time (in seconds), hence tan α is the mass flux in eq. (2) , in, say [ μg / μm 2 s ]. fig ft0 fig mode=article f1 fig/graphic|fig/alternatives/graphic mode="anchored" m1 Open in a separate window caption a7 Mass release curves at a point of a continuum determined computationally. (a) Composite medium and small (reference volume RV) around a point P. (b) Schematics of microstructure and FE model for diffusion, with boundary conditions. (c) Molecular dynamics (MD) schematics of calculation of the effective diffusion coefficient. (d) Mass release curves obtained using FE model of RV, normalized to the inlet/outlet surface area, in, say, [ μg / μm 2 ]. (e) Change of diffusion coefficient with the distance from solid surface for three concentrations (distance is of nanometer size; D bulk is diffusion coefficient far from surface).

Techniques: Concentration Assay, Diffusion-based Assay

Extracellular space of skin. (a) Fibrous structure according to [60]. (b) A simplified RV model. (c) Diffusion coefficient for free diffusion in the liquid (Dbulk) and equivalent diffusion coefficient. Model size: 125,000 3D finite elements, 132,651 nodes.

Journal: Computers in biology and medicine

Article Title: Mass release curves as the constitutive curves for modeling diffusive transport within biological tissue

doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.06.026

Figure Lengend Snippet: Extracellular space of skin. (a) Fibrous structure according to [60]. (b) A simplified RV model. (c) Diffusion coefficient for free diffusion in the liquid (Dbulk) and equivalent diffusion coefficient. Model size: 125,000 3D finite elements, 132,651 nodes.

Article Snippet: From follows that the tangent to a mass release curve (normalized with respect to the area) geometrically determines the mass flux at a considered time, J i = ( dm dt ) i = tan α (2) and then, for a given gradient ( dc / dx ) i , D i = ( dm / dt ) i ( dc / dx ) i , no sum on i (3) Note that dm has dimension mass/(unit area) and dt is time (in seconds), hence tan α is the mass flux in eq. (2) , in, say [ μg / μm 2 s ]. fig ft0 fig mode=article f1 fig/graphic|fig/alternatives/graphic mode="anchored" m1 Open in a separate window caption a7 Mass release curves at a point of a continuum determined computationally. (a) Composite medium and small (reference volume RV) around a point P. (b) Schematics of microstructure and FE model for diffusion, with boundary conditions. (c) Molecular dynamics (MD) schematics of calculation of the effective diffusion coefficient. (d) Mass release curves obtained using FE model of RV, normalized to the inlet/outlet surface area, in, say, [ μg / μm 2 ]. (e) Change of diffusion coefficient with the distance from solid surface for three concentrations (distance is of nanometer size; D bulk is diffusion coefficient far from surface).

Techniques: Diffusion-based Assay

(a) Collagen presence in reference volumes RV1-RV5. (b) Computed field of diffusion coefficient for protein. Model size: minimum size model RV1-48,474 2D elements, 952 fictitious 1D elements, 49,665 nodes; maximum size model RV2-196,048 2D elements, 3,846 fictitious 1D elements, 200,769 nodes.

Journal: Computers in biology and medicine

Article Title: Mass release curves as the constitutive curves for modeling diffusive transport within biological tissue

doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.06.026

Figure Lengend Snippet: (a) Collagen presence in reference volumes RV1-RV5. (b) Computed field of diffusion coefficient for protein. Model size: minimum size model RV1-48,474 2D elements, 952 fictitious 1D elements, 49,665 nodes; maximum size model RV2-196,048 2D elements, 3,846 fictitious 1D elements, 200,769 nodes.

Article Snippet: From follows that the tangent to a mass release curve (normalized with respect to the area) geometrically determines the mass flux at a considered time, J i = ( dm dt ) i = tan α (2) and then, for a given gradient ( dc / dx ) i , D i = ( dm / dt ) i ( dc / dx ) i , no sum on i (3) Note that dm has dimension mass/(unit area) and dt is time (in seconds), hence tan α is the mass flux in eq. (2) , in, say [ μg / μm 2 s ]. fig ft0 fig mode=article f1 fig/graphic|fig/alternatives/graphic mode="anchored" m1 Open in a separate window caption a7 Mass release curves at a point of a continuum determined computationally. (a) Composite medium and small (reference volume RV) around a point P. (b) Schematics of microstructure and FE model for diffusion, with boundary conditions. (c) Molecular dynamics (MD) schematics of calculation of the effective diffusion coefficient. (d) Mass release curves obtained using FE model of RV, normalized to the inlet/outlet surface area, in, say, [ μg / μm 2 ]. (e) Change of diffusion coefficient with the distance from solid surface for three concentrations (distance is of nanometer size; D bulk is diffusion coefficient far from surface).

Techniques: Diffusion-based Assay

 Diffusion coefficient  [µm 2 /s] calculated from collagen content, and partitioning coefficient used for RV modeling. D 255 - diffusion in water-like media, aka nominal, and D 180 - diffusion across fibers.

Journal: Computers in biology and medicine

Article Title: Mass release curves as the constitutive curves for modeling diffusive transport within biological tissue

doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.06.026

Figure Lengend Snippet: Diffusion coefficient [µm 2 /s] calculated from collagen content, and partitioning coefficient used for RV modeling. D 255 - diffusion in water-like media, aka nominal, and D 180 - diffusion across fibers.

Article Snippet: From follows that the tangent to a mass release curve (normalized with respect to the area) geometrically determines the mass flux at a considered time, J i = ( dm dt ) i = tan α (2) and then, for a given gradient ( dc / dx ) i , D i = ( dm / dt ) i ( dc / dx ) i , no sum on i (3) Note that dm has dimension mass/(unit area) and dt is time (in seconds), hence tan α is the mass flux in eq. (2) , in, say [ μg / μm 2 s ]. fig ft0 fig mode=article f1 fig/graphic|fig/alternatives/graphic mode="anchored" m1 Open in a separate window caption a7 Mass release curves at a point of a continuum determined computationally. (a) Composite medium and small (reference volume RV) around a point P. (b) Schematics of microstructure and FE model for diffusion, with boundary conditions. (c) Molecular dynamics (MD) schematics of calculation of the effective diffusion coefficient. (d) Mass release curves obtained using FE model of RV, normalized to the inlet/outlet surface area, in, say, [ μg / μm 2 ]. (e) Change of diffusion coefficient with the distance from solid surface for three concentrations (distance is of nanometer size; D bulk is diffusion coefficient far from surface).

Techniques: Diffusion-based Assay, Membrane

Equivalent  diffusion coefficient  for each RV obtained using mass release curves

Journal: Computers in biology and medicine

Article Title: Mass release curves as the constitutive curves for modeling diffusive transport within biological tissue

doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.06.026

Figure Lengend Snippet: Equivalent diffusion coefficient for each RV obtained using mass release curves

Article Snippet: From follows that the tangent to a mass release curve (normalized with respect to the area) geometrically determines the mass flux at a considered time, J i = ( dm dt ) i = tan α (2) and then, for a given gradient ( dc / dx ) i , D i = ( dm / dt ) i ( dc / dx ) i , no sum on i (3) Note that dm has dimension mass/(unit area) and dt is time (in seconds), hence tan α is the mass flux in eq. (2) , in, say [ μg / μm 2 s ]. fig ft0 fig mode=article f1 fig/graphic|fig/alternatives/graphic mode="anchored" m1 Open in a separate window caption a7 Mass release curves at a point of a continuum determined computationally. (a) Composite medium and small (reference volume RV) around a point P. (b) Schematics of microstructure and FE model for diffusion, with boundary conditions. (c) Molecular dynamics (MD) schematics of calculation of the effective diffusion coefficient. (d) Mass release curves obtained using FE model of RV, normalized to the inlet/outlet surface area, in, say, [ μg / μm 2 ]. (e) Change of diffusion coefficient with the distance from solid surface for three concentrations (distance is of nanometer size; D bulk is diffusion coefficient far from surface).

Techniques: Diffusion-based Assay

Diffusion coefficient field for protein molecule, in [µm2/s]. (a) X-direction (DXmax = 19.2, DXmin = 5.4). (b) Y-direction (DYmax = 17.5, DYmin = 8.7). Model size: 35,418 2D elements, 35,418 nodes.

Journal: Computers in biology and medicine

Article Title: Mass release curves as the constitutive curves for modeling diffusive transport within biological tissue

doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.06.026

Figure Lengend Snippet: Diffusion coefficient field for protein molecule, in [µm2/s]. (a) X-direction (DXmax = 19.2, DXmin = 5.4). (b) Y-direction (DYmax = 17.5, DYmin = 8.7). Model size: 35,418 2D elements, 35,418 nodes.

Article Snippet: From follows that the tangent to a mass release curve (normalized with respect to the area) geometrically determines the mass flux at a considered time, J i = ( dm dt ) i = tan α (2) and then, for a given gradient ( dc / dx ) i , D i = ( dm / dt ) i ( dc / dx ) i , no sum on i (3) Note that dm has dimension mass/(unit area) and dt is time (in seconds), hence tan α is the mass flux in eq. (2) , in, say [ μg / μm 2 s ]. fig ft0 fig mode=article f1 fig/graphic|fig/alternatives/graphic mode="anchored" m1 Open in a separate window caption a7 Mass release curves at a point of a continuum determined computationally. (a) Composite medium and small (reference volume RV) around a point P. (b) Schematics of microstructure and FE model for diffusion, with boundary conditions. (c) Molecular dynamics (MD) schematics of calculation of the effective diffusion coefficient. (d) Mass release curves obtained using FE model of RV, normalized to the inlet/outlet surface area, in, say, [ μg / μm 2 ]. (e) Change of diffusion coefficient with the distance from solid surface for three concentrations (distance is of nanometer size; D bulk is diffusion coefficient far from surface).

Techniques: Diffusion-based Assay